diff --git a/bin/make-winux b/bin/make-winux
index 073592f..d579ad8 100755
--- a/bin/make-winux
+++ b/bin/make-winux
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ mount ${WINUX_LOOP_DEV}p1 /mnt/winux
 
 
 export LINUX_LOOP_DEV="$(losetup --find --show --partscan $LINUX_DISK_IMG)"
+
+tune2fs ${WINUX_LOOP_DEV}p1 -U 1be261e2-a12d-4468-aa45-cbd7e68636eb
+
 mount ${LINUX_LOOP_DEV}p1 /mnt/linux
 
 
@@ -111,25 +114,33 @@ done
 # Create an archive
 #
 
-# echo "making the archive"
-# zstd -T0 --ultra -22 winux.img -o winux.img.zst
+echo "making the archive"
 
-# # decompression with 
-# # unzstd --sparse winux.img.zst
-# # or
-# # zstd -d --sparse winux.img.zst -o winux.img
+# Best compressing rato, but slow and memory hungry (I LIKE IT)
+#tar --sparse -I 'zstd -T0 --ultra -22 --long=31' \
+#  -cvf winux.img.tar.zst winux.img
+## SO I PICKED NOW FOR SPEED
+tar --sparse -I 'zstd -T0 -9' -cvf winux.img.tar.zst winux.img
 
-############# Another option, seems to be the best option
 
-tar --sparse -I 'zstd -T0 --ultra -22 --long=31' \
-  -cvf winux.img.tar.zst winux.img
 # extract
 # brew install gnu-tar
 # tar -I zstd -xvf winux.img.tar.zst
-# on macOS  /opt/homebrew/opt/gnu-tar/libexec/gnubin/tar -I 'zstd --long=31' -xvf winux.img.tar.zst winux.img
+# on macOS gtar or  /opt/homebrew/opt/gnu-tar/libexec/gnubin/tar -I 'zstd --long=31' -xvf winux.img.tar.zst winux.img
+
+
+# FINISHED
+#=======================================================
 
 # compressing with XZ. Supprisely it seems to have worst compresion rate than zstd
 
 # tar --sparse -I 'xz -T0 -9e' -cvf winux.img.tar.xz winux.img
 ## Extracting
 # tar -I xz -xvf winux.img.tar.xz
+#
+# zstd -T0 --ultra -22 winux.img -o winux.img.zst
+
+# # decompression with 
+# # unzstd --sparse winux.img.zst
+# # or
+# # zstd -d --sparse winux.img.zst -o winux.img